<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ontlaw.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ontlaw.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 20:42:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Quantum Meruit</title>
		<link>http://www.ontlaw.com/quantum-meruit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ontlaw.com/quantum-meruit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 00:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Construction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ontlaw.com/?p=2168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As we have already discussed (see May 2011 newsletter), all is not necessarily lost when lien rights are gone and the person above the claimant in the construction ladder is judgment proof. The possibility to jump a rung still exists. &#8230; <a href="http://www.ontlaw.com/quantum-meruit/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ontlaw.com/quantum-meruit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who is a &#8220;subcontractor&#8221; under the Construction Lien Act?</title>
		<link>http://www.ontlaw.com/who-is-a-subcontractor-under-the-construction-lien-act/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ontlaw.com/who-is-a-subcontractor-under-the-construction-lien-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Construction Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question of the Day]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ontlaw.com/?p=2134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A &#8220;subcontractor&#8221; means a person not contracting with or employed directly by the owner or an agent of the owner but who supplies services or materials to the improvement under an agreement with the contractor or under the contractor with &#8230; <a href="http://www.ontlaw.com/who-is-a-subcontractor-under-the-construction-lien-act/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ontlaw.com/who-is-a-subcontractor-under-the-construction-lien-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who is a &#8220;contractor&#8221; under the Construction Lien Act?</title>
		<link>http://www.ontlaw.com/who-is-a-contractor-under-the-construction-lien-act/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ontlaw.com/who-is-a-contractor-under-the-construction-lien-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Construction Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question of the Day]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ontlaw.com/?p=2132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A “contractor” means a person contracting with or employed directly by the owner, or an agent of the owner to supply services or materials to an improvement. &#160; Disclaimer of Liability The answers to the question of the day are &#8230; <a href="http://www.ontlaw.com/who-is-a-contractor-under-the-construction-lien-act/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ontlaw.com/who-is-a-contractor-under-the-construction-lien-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who is entitled to a lien under the Construction Lien Act?</title>
		<link>http://www.ontlaw.com/who-is-entitled-to-a-lien-under-the-construction-lien-act/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ontlaw.com/who-is-entitled-to-a-lien-under-the-construction-lien-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 14:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Construction Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question of the Day]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ontlaw.com/?p=2130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any person who supplies services or materials to an improvement for an owner, contractor, or subcontractor has a lien upon the interest of the owner in the premises for the price of those services or materials. &#160; Disclaimer of Liability &#8230; <a href="http://www.ontlaw.com/who-is-entitled-to-a-lien-under-the-construction-lien-act/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ontlaw.com/who-is-entitled-to-a-lien-under-the-construction-lien-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How long does a plaintiff have to serve a statement of claim in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice?</title>
		<link>http://www.ontlaw.com/statement-of-claim/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ontlaw.com/statement-of-claim/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 20:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question of the Day]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ontlaw.com/?p=2124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A plaintiff must serve the statement of claim within six months after it is issued. &#160; Disclaimer of Liability The answers to the question of the day are intended to provide helpful general information; however, it is not legal advice. &#8230; <a href="http://www.ontlaw.com/statement-of-claim/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ontlaw.com/statement-of-claim/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hardball</title>
		<link>http://www.ontlaw.com/hardball/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ontlaw.com/hardball/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lawyers' Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ontlaw.com/?p=2118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Assuming that the terms of a mortgage deny a mortgagor the right to lease a mortgaged property without the mortgagee&#8217;s consent, what can happen to the mortgagor when he leases the property without that consent and what happens when the &#8230; <a href="http://www.ontlaw.com/hardball/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ontlaw.com/hardball/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How long does a defendant have to deliver a statement of defence to an action commenced in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice?</title>
		<link>http://www.ontlaw.com/statement-of-defence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ontlaw.com/statement-of-defence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 14:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Question of the Day]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ontlaw.com/?p=2114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A defendant has twenty days to deliver a statement of defence if the defendant was served in Ontario. Time begins to run from the date of service. If the defendant was personally served with the statement of claim, then time &#8230; <a href="http://www.ontlaw.com/statement-of-defence/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ontlaw.com/statement-of-defence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wacko</title>
		<link>http://www.ontlaw.com/wacko-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ontlaw.com/wacko-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2012 01:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Collections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ontlaw.com/?p=2109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[     We could just as easily have entitled this article as &#8220;Gullible&#8221; or &#8220;Audacious&#8221;.       It seems that people have been promoting a scheme, through radio programs and hotel seminars, entitled &#8220;Sovereign Man&#8221;. The purpose of the scheme is to &#8230; <a href="http://www.ontlaw.com/wacko-2/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ontlaw.com/wacko-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Election</title>
		<link>http://www.ontlaw.com/election/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ontlaw.com/election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 21:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Construction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ontlaw.com/?p=2100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ELECTION  Normally, courts try to see through procedural barriers to arrive at a decision that deals with the issues on the merits. However, often there is a tension between procedure and the merits. Procedure attempts to strike a balance between &#8230; <a href="http://www.ontlaw.com/election/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ontlaw.com/election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Foiled</title>
		<link>http://www.ontlaw.com/foiled/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ontlaw.com/foiled/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Collections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ontlaw.com/?p=2053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We seem to be on a roll with fraudulent conveyances and trust defences, so we are going to continue our analysis with another fact scenario, one that was the subject of Michael Jenner &#38; Associates Inc. v. Saunders, a 2011 &#8230; <a href="http://www.ontlaw.com/foiled/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ontlaw.com/foiled/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

