<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Speigel Nichols Fox LLP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ontlaw.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ontlaw.com</link>
	<description>Our clients come first. Everything else follows.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:55:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Foiled</title>
		<link>http://www.ontlaw.com/foiled/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ontlaw.com/foiled/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Collections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ontlaw.com/?p=2053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We seem to be on a roll with fraudulent conveyances and trust defences, so we are going to continue our analysis with another fact scenario, one that was the subject of Michael Jenner &#38; Associates Inc. v. Saunders, a 2011 &#8230; <a href="http://www.ontlaw.com/foiled/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ontlaw.com/foiled/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retainer #2</title>
		<link>http://www.ontlaw.com/retainer-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ontlaw.com/retainer-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 05:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lawyers' Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ontlaw.com/?p=2059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[     When does the limitation period start to run for the services a lawyer has performed: from the date that the retainer ends or from the date that is 30 days after the lawyer has rendered the account for the &#8230; <a href="http://www.ontlaw.com/retainer-2/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ontlaw.com/retainer-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Swine</title>
		<link>http://www.ontlaw.com/swine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ontlaw.com/swine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 05:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lawyers' Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ontlaw.com/?p=2057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[     Every now and then, the archaic concepts of champerty and maintenance rear their ugly heads. The last time we saw them was in the case of Clark v. Werden 2011 CarswellOnt 10331, 2011 ONCA 619. Parties      Messrs. A, &#8230; <a href="http://www.ontlaw.com/swine/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ontlaw.com/swine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Extras</title>
		<link>http://www.ontlaw.com/extras/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ontlaw.com/extras/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 01:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Construction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ontlaw.com/?p=2051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ We have a significant body of law dealing with tender and contract formation. We also have a significant body of law dealing with claims for extras. What happens when the law of contract formation and tender meets the law dealing &#8230; <a href="http://www.ontlaw.com/extras/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ontlaw.com/extras/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Check</title>
		<link>http://www.ontlaw.com/check-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ontlaw.com/check-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 21:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lawyers' Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ontlaw.com/?p=2042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A customer sets up systems so that, to be valid, every cheque requires the signatures of two specified signing officers. The customer ensures that it signs a banking resolution to this effect and supplies its bank with that resolution. The &#8230; <a href="http://www.ontlaw.com/check-2/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ontlaw.com/check-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Trust</title>
		<link>http://www.ontlaw.com/legal-trust/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ontlaw.com/legal-trust/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 21:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Collections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ontlaw.com/?p=2036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ As we have discussed on prior occasions, debtors and creditors often play a cat and mouse game. Debtors hide or fraudulently convey their assets and creditors seek to find the assets or set aside the fraudulent transfers. Creditors are often &#8230; <a href="http://www.ontlaw.com/legal-trust/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ontlaw.com/legal-trust/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Assent</title>
		<link>http://www.ontlaw.com/assent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ontlaw.com/assent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 21:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Construction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ontlaw.com/?p=2022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In order to hold a director or officer liable for a corporation&#8217;s breach of trust, the beneficiary of the trust must prove, under section 13(1) of the Construction Lien Act, that the director &#8220;assents to, or acquiesces in, conduct that &#8230; <a href="http://www.ontlaw.com/assent/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ontlaw.com/assent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Depends X 3</title>
		<link>http://www.ontlaw.com/depends-x-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ontlaw.com/depends-x-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 23:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Collections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ontlaw.com/?p=2010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The saga of Re Edwards continues (see newsletters of April &#38; August 2011). The credit union that had scooped a bankrupt&#8217;s RSP mere days before the bankruptcy, appealed an order of a judge of the Superior Court of Justice, who &#8230; <a href="http://www.ontlaw.com/depends-x-3/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ontlaw.com/depends-x-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>They Made Me</title>
		<link>http://www.ontlaw.com/they-made-me/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ontlaw.com/they-made-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 23:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Collections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ontlaw.com/?p=2007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Occasionally a case is reported and you have to wonder why it was ever litigated. One such case is Royal Bank of Canada v. Jaffer, a 2011 decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.  Did Not Want To  The &#8230; <a href="http://www.ontlaw.com/they-made-me/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ontlaw.com/they-made-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Experts</title>
		<link>http://www.ontlaw.com/experts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ontlaw.com/experts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 23:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lawyers' Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ontlaw.com/?p=2003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lawyer retains an expert on behalf of a client. Who is liable to pay the expert: the lawyer, the client, or both? This was the subject matter of 14013337 Ontario Ltd. v. MacIvor Harris Roddy LLP 2011 CarswellOnt 822 &#8230; <a href="http://www.ontlaw.com/experts/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ontlaw.com/experts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

